Sunday, November 7, 2010

Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds

After much deliberation about which book I wanted to present I have chosen Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds, by Dorothy Holland, Debra Skinner, William Lachicotte Jr., and Carole Cain.

This is a book devoted to identity and its impermance - "Identities -  if they are alive, if they are being lived, they are unfinished and continue to be in process", (p.vii). 

Chapter One -

Identities are based on how we tell ourselves who we are and then act as though we are who we say we are (p.3).  Oftentimes situations beyond our control define our identities.  We produce, from the available cultural resources, understandings from social situations that are respective of our experiences.  Sometimes histories contine to settle in us and we can be caught in a web of tensions with the present discourse.  But the bottom line is that our identity is constantly refashioning itself which ultimately paves the way towards agency.

Out of the endless theories, this book is taking the definition of identity from the perspective of anthropological cultural studies adapted to 'sociogenic concepts of personhood', an idea claimed by G.H. Mead.  These theories approach self consciousness and self reflection as beginning in early childhood development.  As the child grows, she takes on the stand pont of others 'as she learns to objectify herself by the qualities of her performance and eventually identifying herself to social positions such as mother, student, good person, etc.  Their more proactive identities will come from the stand points from which they are more emotionally attached.   Thus identities are the key means throught which people care about and care for what is going on around them, (p.5).

The authors of this book have taken on the task of looking at contemporary cultural studies, joined with  feminist  theory's engagement with issues of identity, and also by the intellectual tradition of the great Soviet psychologist L.S. Vygotsky and his students and M. M. Bakhtin, the critical theorist and semiotician. 

Bakhtin's work was inspired by a new-Kantian tradition of philosophy that emphasized aesthetics that continued to move into two different directions.  First, studying literature and art - looking closely at the means for representing characters and ultimately their authors.    And secondly, he took on the study of sociology of human expression, which these authors believe belongs more at home in the contemporary cultural studies than the social science or literary stuies of the time. 

Vygotsky came to his study of persons from interests in literature, art, and linguistics.  He carried a fascination with symbols into his psychology and organized his later studies around social interaction, as so many ways in which people free themselves from the tyranny of environmental stimuli, (p.6).

Thus, the authors take Bakhtin's concern with the social weighing of expression and the creative life of association, combined with Vygotsky's emphases on historical development and on the potentiality of symbols for (re)formation, affords a means by which 'cultural studies of the person' may avoid a common conceptual dilemma - one that traps persons permanently, either in 'cultural logic' or in 'subject positions' or in some combination of the two. 

Identity in this book is not so much referring to a "cultural identity" such as ethnicity, gender, race, nationality, and sexual orientation, but are taking the definition to a broader level and are focusing on the development of identitites and agency specific to "practices and activities situated in historically contingent, socially enacted, culturally constructed 'worlds': recognized field or frames of social life, such as romance, mental illness and his treatment, domestic relations, Alcoholics Anonymous, academia, and local politics" (p.7).

The authors of this book move away from the more traditional Western ideas of identity as a prototype of a coherent, unified, and originary subject.  The authors here are delving into feminist and later psychodynamic approaches, both of which recognize those social forces which make such an integrated subject an extremely unlikely occurence.  They argue that people are composites of many, often times contradictory, self-understandings and identities that are not so much confined to the body but spread over the material and social environment. 

This book is framed by following Bakhtin, a dialogic one; following Vygotsky, a developmental one,.  Then they build upon the culturalist and the constructivist to understant people's actions and possibilities.  All the perspectives will assume that the behavior is mediated by senses of self or what the authors call 'identities'.  "In the older of the two approaches that we work to transcend, the person is driven by an internalized cultural logic; in the more recent, by social situation," (pp. 8-9).

Two Perspectives on Identity

The authors describe an incident that happened to Dorothy Holland and Debra Skinner in Nepal.  They are using this incident as an example of the two perspectives on identity.  Holland and Skinner were interviewing people for a small research project in central Nepal.  Naudada is a rural hill community that is occupied by people of different caste/ethnic groups.  While the researchers were interviewing a range of women from different levels of castes they were inviting them to be interviewed at Debra's house.  While this was already an uncomfortable situation for the women to be in the same room with others of different castes one woman actually followed the laws of her caste and did not enter the house by the front door, which entailed passing by a hearth and the kitchen, which according to their beliefs would contaminate the food, she instead scaled the walls of the building and entered the second floor balcony from the outside. 

From the Culturalist perspective, the woman Gyanumaya's actions justifies her painstaking attention to all of the details of caste, pollution, sin, dharma and other related concepts.  From a Constructivist position, we emphasize the soical positional that goes on whenever people interact.  Thus gyanumaya, by entering the house through the kitchen, would mean assuming a higher position than her caste would allow.  It is a claim about a social position.  "It invites notice of the improvisation as a sign of positioning by powerful discourses," (p. 16).

10 comments:

  1. HI Laurie:
    Thanks for the interesting post. The following quote reminds me a lot of the book I reviewed.

    "...people are composites of many, often times contradictory, self-understandings and identities that are not so much confined to the body but spread over the material and social environment." To Norton, identity is a nonunitary subject, site of struggle, and changing over time. Both ideas seems to speak to the diverse nature of our identities and how they're socially constructed rather than an essential fixed core.

    Since the interviews were at Debra's house (I assume she's not Nepali), I wonder how the women would've reacted had Gyanumaya not followed caste protocol. Just a curiosity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought of your presentation as well Anni. I personally was wondering why these anthropologists were so ethnocentric as to ask these ladies to break the laws of their caste in order to be interviewed in an upstairs appartment that was obviously uncomfortable within the laws they lived by all of their lives. They could have held the interviews in a more supportive and less tense environment. Laurie

    ReplyDelete
  3. Laurie,

    What you mention here you had mentioned to me in class, and reading your account of it here, I also feel somewhat uncomfortable imagining the scene in the researcher's apartment in which all of these women from different castes come together to be interviewed. Do the authors at all deal with this ethnocentrism of their own? Or talk about why they chose to conduct their interviews in such a manner?

    ReplyDelete
  4. No, there is no mention about their own ethnocentrism nor how they chose to conduct their interviews. But, on page 275, the dialogue continues to explain that a "Chetri (higher-caste)woman was already seated on the balcony when Gyanumaya arrived." They think that Gyanumaya, as one who had no right to enter the kitchen of a house clearly occupied by higher-caste persons, would be compelled by social power, not cultural "logic", and constrained in her access to the house's space by her subordinate social position, not by her embrace of a cultural imperative that just happened to disadvantage her. I think the researchers saw this odd action and ran with it as a way to make their point on identity and the cultural laws that bind people to them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Laurie,
    Wow, this is really interesting! It's interesting to look at the study of identity from different perspectives. As a people of any ethnic group, I think that we are all multidimensional with many different life experiences that shape the many identities that we have built within our lives. In what time period did the interview occur? It's hard to visualize Gyanumaya scaling the walls to get to her interview appointment. But her belief in her caste position was evidently so strong and her action to behave according to that identity does seem to bind her to the hegemonic situation which may be instilled in their cultural laws? In the end, this example does seem to fit into what the researchers were trying to avoid as in your seventh paragraph as "not referring to cultural identiy" but it does include the ethnicity, gender, race and nationality of the people in this "incident."
    Angelina

    ReplyDelete
  6. Laurie,
    I think how the authors of your book here try to analyze "identity" using two approaches: cultural and Constructivist is very much similar to what Baker (2006) mentioned about "identities". We do not own an identity so much as Hybrid and multiple identities (Baker, 2006). Our social construction of our gender, age, ethnicity, race, dress, nationality, region, locality, group membership (e.g. religion, politics), socioeconomic class, for example, provide us with complementary, diverse, ever-changing, negotiated identities. As situation change, so our identities are reframed, developed and sometimes challenged. We don't establish our identities by ourselves but through social comparisons, labeling by others, dialogue within ourselves and within others (Baker, 2006) . Noha Ghaly

    ReplyDelete
  7. In chapter one paragraph 4, you talk about Baktin and how his studies focused on "literature and art - looking closely at the means for representing characters and ultimately their authors" Do you mean here that he stduied the characters in different novels and dramas and tried to establish a relationship between these characters and their authors? if yes, with what purpose? I am not sure what is meant here by characters? I would appreciate it if you explain to me more!
    Noha Ghaly

    ReplyDelete
  8. Laurie: Like the others, I was struck by the story of the lower caste woman who felt compelled to risk life and limb simply to maintain caste boundaries, boundaries that would maintain her subordinate social position relative to her "peers." I am wondering if the author's address identity in situations where identity seems to have been totally defined by cultural practices. This woman was born into a lower caste family. Her basic identity, and the only one other castes might care about, was defined for her by the culture before she was even born. Would she believe she had any free will in terms of personal identity? Does she have some control over her identity within her own caste? It seems to me that maybe identity as anything other than a culturally imposed phenomenon is a western idea, exported imperialistically to other cultures, and then used as a cultural measuring stick to make the case of caste based or sex based oppression. As a westerner with western values, I do indeed believe a lower caste woman in Nepal is oppressed in many different ways and on many different levels. But I don't believe I have the right to measure her personal worth, or degree of perceived oppression, simply because of my privileged status as a consequential member of an "educated" (whatever that means!), industrialized society; a society whose members have the distinct luxury of contemplating the possibility of traveling far from home to "study" other people in an objectified manner.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anni, you are right; I have read Norton this weekend for another class and as you have said the authors argument about identity in these lines resembles Norton's perspective on identity.

    I think the authors' definition of identity in this book looks similar to Norton's view of identity because they all define identity based on the (poststructuralist) feminist theory or perspective on identity.... Abdullah

    ReplyDelete
  10. Laurie,
    I have been struggling with "identity" as I try to write my third paper...long story. It seems that many of the studies we are exposed to are of Western or similar perspectives. I do agree with David and his view on how we might be interpreting this study. I wonder what a Nepali researcher may have said about this woman's actions.
    That said, it does seem that when we do discuss identity, it is in the sense that we have not only out physical and social positions on identity, but the covert aspects. Most of what we have read, from Vygotsky to Gee have demonstrated the fluidity of identity. My problem is how can it be synthesized to be able to truly explain a person or people?
    Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete